North Korea company search: no public company registry

TL;DR. North Korea (DPRK) has no publicly accessible company registry, no published fee schedule and no beneficial ownership register. The UN Security Council page at https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/1718 resolves to https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1718, titled Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1718 (2006); it is a sanctions committee page, not a company register. The US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control publishes at https://ofac.treasury.gov. Commercial contact with DPRK entities remains a sanctions question, not a registry lookup.

No public registry exists

The DPRK does not operate a publicly accessible company registration system. There is no government portal, no official search interface, and no commercial aggregator covering DPRK-registered entities in a form accessible to foreign buyers. Entity registration in the DPRK is handled through internal party and state bureaucratic processes that do not produce publicly available corporate records.

In practice, DPRK-related entities that foreign compliance buyers encounter are typically:

• Third-country front companies used by DPRK actors to evade sanctions (commonly registered in China, Russia, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East)
• Shipping companies operating DPRK-flagged or DPRK-linked vessels
• Joint ventures with state entities in permissive jurisdictions
• Financial intermediaries involved in sanctions evasion networks

The relevant compliance question is therefore not “how do I verify a DPRK company” but “how do I detect DPRK beneficial ownership or DPRK nexus in a counterparty registered in another jurisdiction.”

The sanctions framework

UN Security Council sanctions (1718 Committee)

UN Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006) and subsequent resolutions (1874, 2094, 2270, 2321, 2356, 2371, 2375, 2397) impose complete sanctions on the DPRK in response to its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs. These resolutions are binding on all UN member states and cover:

• Arms embargo (complete)
• Luxury goods embargo
• Coal, iron, seafood, and other commodity export restrictions
• Oil and petroleum product import caps
• Financial services restrictions
• Shipping and vessel controls
• Prohibition on new joint ventures with DPRK entities
• Requirement to repatriate DPRK workers in member states

The 1718 Committee and Panel of Experts report on violations. The committee page is reachable, but it is a sanctions committee page and not a DPRK company register; the list contents themselves are published separately.

OFAC North Korea sanctions

OFAC maintains North Korea-specific sanctions under Executive Order 13722 and the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016. These prohibit US persons from virtually all transactions with DPRK entities, including:

• Financial transactions
• Trade in goods, services, and technology
• New investment
• Import of DPRK goods or services

The OFAC SDN List includes hundreds of DPRK-designated entities and individuals, as well as vessels. Secondary sanctions provisions in E.O. 13810 extend restrictions to non-US persons engaged in material transactions with the DPRK. OFAC publishes at https://ofac.treasury.gov; the fields its sanctions search offers are not set out here, so confirm at source.

EU and UK restrictive measures

The EU maintains autonomous DPRK restrictive measures under Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (as amended) implementing UN Security Council resolutions and adding EU-specific designations. The UK maintains equivalent measures under the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019. Both regimes prohibit EU/UK persons from transacting with listed entities and apply sectoral restrictions on trade, finance, and shipping.

Detecting DPRK nexus in third-country entities

Since DPRK entities rarely appear directly as counterparties, the compliance challenge is identifying DPRK beneficial ownership or DPRK-linked funding in entities registered elsewhere.

Key red flags identified in UN Panel of Experts reports and OFAC advisories include:

• Shell companies in China, Hong Kong, Singapore, or Southeast Asian jurisdictions with no apparent business substance
• Shipping companies operating in the Yellow Sea or East China Sea with irregular vessel tracking (AIS dark periods)
• Companies with ownership structures that obscure the ultimate beneficial owner through multiple layers of nominee shareholders
• Payments routed through multiple jurisdictions without obvious commercial rationale
• Claims of DPRK-origin goods rebranded as Chinese or Russian products (particularly coal, seafood, textiles)
• IT services companies with DPRK-origin workers (see CISA/FBI advisory on DPRK IT workers, 2022-2024)

OFAC has published multiple advisories on DPRK sanctions evasion typologies, including specific alerts on maritime shipping, IT worker fraud, and cryptocurrency theft; confirm at source.

FATF status

The DPRK does not participate in FATF or any FATF-style regional body. FATF publishes its black and grey lists at fatf-gafi.org. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is named on the High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action list of 19 June 2026, and is not on the increased-monitoring list of the same date; confirm at source.

Practical guidance

• Any DPRK nexus requires immediate escalation. There is no routine due diligence pathway for DPRK-related entities. Escalate to compliance leadership and qualified sanctions counsel.
• Screen against the UN 1718 list, OFAC SDN list, and EU consolidated list as part of standard counterparty screening for any entity with operations in China, Russia, or Southeast Asia. The 1718 page is a sanctions committee page, not a DPRK company register.
• Vessel screening. For any maritime transaction, screen vessel names, IMO numbers, and flag states against OFAC vessel designations and the UN 1718 Committee vessel list.
• DPRK IT workers. Be alert to individual contractors and software development firms whose workers may be DPRK nationals operating under falsified identities. CISA/FBI advisories provide guidance on detection.
• No transaction without OFAC license. Even exploratory communication with DPRK entities for licensed humanitarian purposes requires advance legal review.

How much does it cost?

There is no public DPRK company registry to price, so the table above reads not applicable rather than free.

FAQ

Is there any legal way to conduct business with North Korea?

Extremely limited categories of activity (academic exchanges, certain humanitarian operations) may be permissible under OFAC general licenses or with a specific license. All other commercial activity is prohibited for US persons. Non-US persons face equivalent restrictions under UN sanctions, EU measures, and UK regulations. The licence position is set by OFAC, the UN, the EU and the UK, each at source; this guide is not legal advice.

How do I know if a Chinese company has DPRK beneficial ownership?

This is a complex beneficial ownership question that commercial databases cannot reliably answer. The UN Panel of Experts reports document specific evasion typologies and named entities. OFAC advisories identify red flags. Financial intelligence analysis and field-level inquiry via a specialised due diligence firm are the methods those reports describe; there is no registry route.

Is North Korea on the FATF grey list?

No, it is on the call-for-action list rather than the grey list. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is named on the FATF High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action list of 19 June 2026, and is not on the increased-monitoring list of the same date; confirm at source.

Is there a DPRK company search URL?

No. There is no DPRK company search address. The UN 1718 Committee page is a sanctions committee page, not a company register, and the OFAC site publishes sanctions lists rather than company records.

Last verified: 2026-09-04. Sources: the UN 1718 Committee page (https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/1718); OFAC (https://ofac.treasury.gov); the FATF black and grey lists as of 19 June 2026. For the full global due diligence framework, see our Global Business Due Diligence Guide.